Quantcast Kimmunications: Fact Collections
Kim Snider

Get Email Updates

  • Add your email address and you will be emailed every time a new post is added to this blog. As always, you have my solemn promise that I will never, ever share your email address with anyone.
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

 

Powered by TypePad
Member since 09/2004

November 03, 2006

Affluent Baby Boomers Ignore Retirement Planning

Many affluent retirees apparently haven’t been convinced that failure to plan is planning to fail, according to a new survey.

 

A third of affluent retirees have no retirement plan at all, according to a survey conducted by MFS Investment Management. An even larger percentage of preretirees age 55 or older, 52%, do not have a retirement plan.

 

The survey talked to retirees and preretirees with at least $100,000 in liquid investable assets and who have a relationship with professional financial advisors. The study, conducted in July, showed that the use of an advisor doesn’t necessarily lead to the creation of a retirement plan. The survey, in fact, found that among the 55-and-over preretiree group, over a third do not plan to discuss a retirement income plan with their advisor for another six or seven years, if ever.

 

The survey also showed a wide gap between the expectations of preretirees, and the reality faced by those already in retirement. When asked to state what age they expect to retire, for example, preretirees give a mean answer of 66, with 17% planning to work beyond age 70. Surveyed retirees, however, reported a mean retirement age of 59.

 

Also, 55% of preretirees plan to work at least part time in retirement, but advisors who participated in the study reported that few to none of their affluent clients work part time in retirement. Preretirees also expect to wait a few years after retirement before withdrawing from their savings account, with an average target age of 68. The reality: most retirees who have begun withdrawing at age 64.

 

Illustrating the trend toward defined contribution retirement plans, more than 70% of retirees rank pensions as a source of income compared to only 54% of preretirees. Meanwhile, 74% of preretirees cite 401(k) plans as a source of income, compared to only 33% of retirees.

 

One area in which both preretirees and retirees have similar views is concerns about the future. A majority of both groups, while generally satisfied with their retirement savings, fears that rising inflation, health-care costs and other issues beyond their control could cause them to outlive their savings.

 

I guess my first question would be what is meant by a retirement plan. What do you think it means? Do you have one? Do you think you need one? Take our survey and feel free to leave additional comments below.

 

 

SOURCE:

 

1. "Frontline News"; Financial Advisor; October 2006

http://www.fa-mag.com/past_issues.php?id_content=3&idPastIssue=114&show=fronline

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

 

September 21, 2006

The Housing Whammy

I have been trying to fashion a cohesive post about the potential aftermath of the housing bubble and refinancing frenzy. I have played with it for about two days now. So far I have failed. So instead, let me just give you a sampling of the issues and the impact we are already seeing.

 

    A January, 2005 report from Dēmos, House of Cards, details the extent to which families have come to depend on credit to finance their life-style, much of it by depleting their home equity with loans that will likely come back to haunt them in the face of rising interest rates and falling home values:

    http://www.demos-usa.org/pubs/AHouseofCards.pdf

     

    Prices of U.S. homes grew at their slowest pace in six and a half years during the second quarter, the government said Tuesday. Home prices increased at a 4.7% annual rate in the quarter, barely keeping up with the 4.4% inflation rate. (MarketWatch requires free registration)

     

    Home prices fell in one-fourth of the major metropolitan areas last quarter. (New York times article - free registration required)

     

    Homebuilders are piling on incentives to move their inventory, including selling your old home. (WSJ requires subscription)

     

    From MarketWatch.com, consumers with adjustable rate mortgages or option ARMS could soon see their mortgage payments double: Just how much are borrowers with option ARMs going to suffer?

     

    A market research piece from Comstock lists facts that illustrate just how big the whammy could be. Among them: 32.6% of new mortgages and home equity loans in 2005 were interest only, up from 0.6% in 2000; 15.2% of 2005 home buyers owe at least 10% more than their home is worth; $2.7 trillion in loans will adjust to higher rates in 2006 and 2007; August foreclosures were up 23% over July and 53% over a year ago.

     

    Many people were sold exotic adjustable rate mortgages by boiler room operations.

     

    Now add in this fact from a NY Times article: Investors now hold $4.6 trillion in mortgage backed securities. That’s more than the outstanding value of the US Treasuries. (New York times article - free registration required)

 

Seems like déjà vu to me. What do you think? Specifically, what do you think the implications are? How will this affect you, if at all? Leave your thoughts and comments below.

 

TIP OF THE HAT: I found several of these links on Barry Ritholtz's excellent blog, The Big Picture. Thanks Barr.

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

September 15, 2006

The Nest Egg Index

A.G. Edwards measured a dozen statistical factors -- including participation in retirement savings plans, personal debt levels and home ownership -- to compile what it calls the "Nest Egg Index." The Nest Egg Index is designed to highlight "geographic regions where people are succeeding and where they face the greatest difficulty in building and nurturing their nest eggs."

 

So where are we succeeding and where are we struggling? Of the 242 major metropolitan markets that made the list, Bridegport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT was the top of the list, followed by San Jose - Sunnyvale - Santa Clara, CA and Minneapolis - St. Paul, MN. The number one community overall, big or small, was Los Alamos, N.M..

 

At the bottom of the list for major metropolitan areas were Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif., Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, Fla., Charleston-North Charleston, S.C., and Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, Texas.

 

An A.G. Edward's press release says communities which ranked high on the list enjoyed strong housing markets and a propensity toward saving and investing, particularly in tax-deferred retirement plans such as IRAs and pension plans.

 

Compared with other countries, the United States is not a nation prone to save. The U.S. Department of Commerce reported that America’s 2005 personal savings rate was a negative 0.5 percent, the lowest in the industrialized world. By comparison, 2005 household net savings rates were 11.6 percent in France, 10.6 percent in Germany, 6.7 percent in Japan, 6.0 percent in the Netherlands and 5.3 percent in Korea, according to the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development.

 

We know many Americans are not adequately preparing for retirement. According to the Nest Egg Survey, only 66 percent of Americans have a retirement plan in place. In addition, in a study released in November 2005, Hewitt Associates found that among employers offering a defined contribution plan, such as a 401(k), nearly a third of eligible employees do not participate.

 

Even as Americans underestimate their need for retirement funding, they are retiring earlier and living longer, increasing the need for a long-term source of income. Less than 20% of men aged 65 or older are in the U.S. labor force, compared with the year 1950, when 46 percent of men that age were working, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. At the same time, life spans have increased, with American men living an average 74.1 years in 2000, compared with 68.2 years in 1950, while women live to an average 79.5 years, compared with 71.1 years in 1950.

 

What do you think it will take to get Americans to start saving? Leave your thoughts and comments below.

 

SOURCES:

 

1. "Invest In Your Future: Savings Statistics" A.G. Edwards Nest Egg Index Media Kit; 14 Sept 2006.

http://www.agedwards.com/public/content/sc/invedu/nest_egg_savings/media_kit.html

 

2. "Nest Egg Index Results" A.G. Edwards Nest Egg Index Media Kit; 14 Sept 2006.

http://www.agedwards.com/public/content/sc/invedu/nest_egg_savings/media_kit.html

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

 

July 17, 2006

Wealth in America 2006

Americans are becoming more focused on preserving wealth. This seems to be particularly true for Americans who already have wealth to preserve - those we refer to as affluent or high net worth.

 

A study done for Northern Trust, titled "Wealth in America 2006," indicates 20% of investors with $1 million or more in investable assets are planning to increase the portion of their portfolio being held in cash. Those investors had an average of 13% of their assets in cash - much higher than traditional asset allocation models recommend. Another 15% was being held in bonds.

 

Interestingly, younger millionaires appear to be even more conservative. They were holding 19% of their portfolio in cash.

 

More than two-thirds of respondents said their focus was on preserving capital rather than growing it further this year. The federal budget deficit, energy prices, terrorism, rising inflation and deteriorating U.S. foreign relations were all factors cited in pessimistic outlook. Participants' expectations for market returns this year were 6%. It should be noted this study was completed in November 2005, well before the recent market declines.

 

Other interesting findings: 68% think real estate is overvalued and 21% manage their own investments. Investors over the age of 75 are far more likely to be assisted by an advisor than their younger counter-parts and men are far more likely to manage their own portfolios than women.

 

Only 30% of high net worth baby boomers are already retired. 40% plan to retire in the next ten years and 27% say it will be more than ten years for them.

 

SOURCES:

 

Nothern Trust. "Wealth in America 2006,"

http://www-ac.northerntrust.com/content/media/attachment/data/white_paper/0602/document/wealth_america2006.pdf

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

March 14, 2006

Boomer Facts

Demographers have been saying for a long time that the baby boomer generation has been more influential than any before it. There is no reason not to believe that they will continue to reshape the way we thing about things - especially in the areas of aging and retirement. Here are some boomer facts:

 

Just how many boomers are there? The estimated number is 78.2 million. Boomers are those born between the years 1946 and 1964.

 

7918 boomers will turn 60 each day in 2006. That amounts to 330 every hour.

 

James and Mary were the most popular names given to boomer babies. Today, Jacob and Emily are the most popular with James and Mary being way down the list. James now ranks as 17th most popular for boys and Mary 63rd for girls.

 

In 1947, only 33% of adults aged 25 and older had a high school diploma. Only 5% had a bachelor's degree. In 2004, those numbers had risen to 85% for high school diplomas and 28% for bachelor's degrees.

 

How many boomers will still be alive in kicking in 2030? The estimate is 7.6 million.

 

Who will be supporting those boomers? There will be an estimated 2.1 workers for each Social Security beneficiary in 2031, when all boomers will be over the age of 65. There are currently 3.3 workers for each Social Security recipient.

 

SOURCE:

 

1. "Deep Impact" Boomer Market Advisor; February 2006; p 16

Cited sources in this sidebar include the U.S. Census Bureau and the Financial Times

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

February 26, 2006

New Pension Data

About 10 percent of workers with employer sponsored retirement plans in 2003 were covered solely by a traditional pension plan while more than 60 percent had only a 401(k) or similar plan. The remaining 30 percent were covered by both types of plans.

 

NOTE: The title of this post may seem unusual given that this information is based on 2001 - 2003 data but Labor Department data is only available through 2000. The CRR's tabulations of this Form 5500 information really is "new" even though it is old.

 

SOURCE:

 

1. Marric Buessing and Mauricio Soto. "The State of Private Pensions: Current 5500 Data" Issue Brief: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Number 42; February, 2006.
http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/ib_42.shtml

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

 

January 07, 2006

Retirement Plan Contribution Limits for 2006

The price of a first class stamp isn't the only thing that went up for 2006. So did the amount you can sock away in tax free and tax deferred retirement plans.

 

Contribution limits for 401(k) and 403(b) plans went up to $15,000 this year from $14,000 this year. The "catch up contribution", for those over the age of 50, went up from $4000 to $5000. That's money you can contribute to your 401(k) over and above the $15,000 limit if you meet the minimum age requirement. Take advantage of the increase by raising the amount deducted from each paycheck.

 

The maximum contribution to a traditional or Roth IRA has remained the same this year at $4000. But the catch up for an IRA has gone from $500 last year to $1000 this year.

 

Other things went up too.

 

Social Security benefits are going up by an average of about $39 per month per person. I suppose if Social Security is all you've got to live on, $39 is a big deal. The government tells us that is the biggest increase since 1991.

 

Of course, one hand gives the other hand takes away. Medicare Part B premiums will go up 13% this year to $88.50 a month, eating into some of the Social Security increase.

 

The amount you can give to someone else without incurring a "gift tax" (which can be as high as 46%) has increased to $12,000 this year from $11,000 in prior years. Couples can give up to $24,000 to one person but must report the gift to the IRS to tell them you are both using your allowance in the same year.

 

Two other things: the standard deduction for people who don't itemize has increased. It's now $10,300 for married filing jointly, $5150 for single or married filing separately and $7550 for head of household. Finally, the income limit for the earned income credit for those with a qualifying child, has gone up to $36,348.

 

UPDATE:

 

One of my Snider Method graduates, Karl Thomas, CPA was nice enough to point out an error in this post in the standard deduction for married couples. I have fixed it in the paragraph above.  Thanks Karl.

 

SOURCE:

 

1. Kathy Chu, "Resolutions for shaping up finances." USA Today 6 February 2006; 4B

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/general/2006-01-06-resolutions-usat_x.htm

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

 

December 27, 2005

When the nest egg cracks

Are you ready for some shocking numbers? 75% of people between the ages of 51 and 61 will experience an event like job loss, divorce, widowhood, new health issues, or the onset of frailty among parents or in-laws within a ten year period. That number jumps to two-thirds among those of us 70 years old or older. And finally, the risk is even greater for those of us who are married and have the added risk of a spouse losing a job or developing health issues.

 

These are the findings of a new paper released in December by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston University titled "When the Nest Egg Cracks: Financial Consequences of Health Problems, Marital Status Changes, and Job Layoffs at Older Ages.

 

To me, these are some staggering numbers. I think we all know that these things can happen but I doubt seriously that anyone would put the odds that high if asked to put a number on it. Let's look at the data from this report in more depth:

 

Health Problems

 

Serious health problems cause out-of-pocket spending to increase and may reduce the ability to work.

 

39 percent of terminally ill patients reported their illness caused moderate to severe financial hardship (Emanuel et al. 2000).

 

Half of Americans filing for bankruptcy cited medical causes (Himmelstein et al. 2001).

 

About three-quarters of those who declared bankruptcy in part because of medical bills had health insurance at the onset of the illness. Insured adults at midlife spend more out of pocket on health care, including insurance premiums, than those without coverage (Johnson and Crystal 2000).

 

Older people devote more of their income to health care than younger people, regardless of health status. For example, 35 percent of families headed by an adult age 65 or older spent 5 percent or more of their income on health care (excluding premium costs) in 1996, compared with 19 percent of families headed by an adult age 55 to 64 and 9 percent of families headed by an adult age 25 to 54 (Merlis 2002).

 

Health problems compound the financial burden of health care costs. Aged Medicare beneficiaries in fair or poor health averaged $4,000 in annual out-of-pocket health care spending in 2003, compared with $2,845 for those in excellent health (Caplan and Brangan 2004).

 

Medical expenses are especially high in the last year of life (Garber, MaCurdy, and McClellan 1999), and often leave surviving spouses with few financial resources (McGarry and Schoeni 2005).

 

Health problems force many older Americans into early retirement (CBO 2004; McGarry 2004), and workers sometimes have to cut back on their work hours to care for ill family members (Coile 2003; Johnson and Favreault 2001; Johnson and LoSasso 2000).

 

In 2001, 35 percent of those bankrupted by medical problems curtailed their employment, often to care for someone else (Himmelstein et al. 2005).

 

Onset of Disability

 

In 2002, about 1.4 million aged adults resided in nursing homes (Spillman and Black 2005), and another 8.7 million aged adults with disabilities lived in the community (Johnson and Wiener forthcoming).

 

Many frail older people have limited financial resources. In 2001, 36 percent of severely disabled older adults living in the community had incomes below 125 percent of the federal poverty level, and their median household wealth was less than $50,000 (Johnson and Wiener forthcoming).

 

Long-term care costs can be staggering. In 2004, the average daily private pay rate for a semi-private room was $169, or about $61,700 per year (MetLife 2004). Home health aides who help with personal care activities charged $18 per hour on average in 2004. For the typical user of paid services who receives 60 hours of paid care per month (Johnson and Wiener forthcoming), annual home care costs total more than $14,000.

 

Private and public insurance for long-term care services is limited. Medicare covers few services, and people must meet strict income and asset tests to qualify for Medicaid. People with too much wealth or income to qualify initially for Medicaid can receive benefits once they have spent nearly all of their resources on long-term care services. According to one estimate, about one-third of nursing home residents ineligible for Medicaid when they are admitted deplete enough of their assets to qualify for coverage before they are discharged (Wiener, Sullivan, and Skaggs 1996).

 

In 2002, only 9 percent of adults age 55 and older had private coverage (Johnson and Uccello 2005).

 

Loss of a Spouse

 

In 2000, 17 percent of widowed women age 65 or older received incomes less than the federal poverty line, compared with just 4 percent of married women (Social Security Administration 2002).

 

Poverty rates at older ages are even higher among divorced women than widowed women. In 2000, 20 percent of divorced women age 65 or older had incomes below the poverty line (Social Security Administration 2002). The share of divorced women in the retired population will grow in the coming decades with the aging of the Baby Boomers, who have much higher divorce rates than earlier generations (Butrica and Iams 2000).

 

Job Loss

 

Job layoffs in the years just prior to retirement can have long- lasting financial consequences. People in their 50s who become unemployed frequently have trouble finding other jobs (Chan and Stevens 2001). Lost labor earnings reduce pension wealth, Social Security wealth, and other savings, threatening retirement security.

 

Prevalence of Negative Events

 

Nearly one-half of adults age 51 to 61 have health problems or frail parents or in-laws needing help with basic personal care.

 

Medical conditions are nearly twice as common at ages 70 and older as at ages 51 to 61.

 

Over a 10-year period, more than three-quarters of adults age 51 to 61 at baseline experience negative shocks, including widowhood, divorce, job layoffs, health problems, or the onset of frailty among parents or in- laws (table 2). Health problems and layoffs dominate at this age. For instance, 41.3 percent experience a major new medical condition, 33.7 percent develop health-related work limitations, 25.9 percent have parents or in- laws who become frail, and 18.7 percent are laid off from their jobs. Few people in their 50s or 60s enter nursing homes or develop severe disabilities. Only 9.8 percent of those married at baseline become widowed over the period, and only 3.0 percent become divorced.

 

More than two-thirds of adults age 70 and older experience at least one negative shock over a nine-year period. About half experience the onset of a major medical condition, with nearly one-quarter developing heart problems. The onset of frailty and cognitive impairment is quite common at older ages, especially among unmarried adults, and many enter nursing homes. Among single adults age 70 and older, 29.0 percent become severely disabled between 1993 and 2002 (or until they die), 16.7 percent become severely cognitively impaired, and 31.8 percent enter nursing homes. In addition, 29.1 percent of those married at baseline become widowed. Fewer than 1 percent of married adults age 70 and older become divorced.

 

The incidence of negative events rises when the analysis accounts for spousal shocks. Among people age 51 to 61 at baseline, 90.5 percent of adults married at the beginning of the period experience a negative shock over a 10- year period or are married to someone who experiences a shock. They become widowed or divorced, their parents or in- laws become frail, or they or their spouses develop health problems, lose their jobs, or enter nursing homes. Among people age 70 and older and married at baseline, 81.6 percent experience negative shocks to their own health or their spouses’ health over a nine-year period, they or their spouses enter nursing homes, or they become widowed or divorced. Among married and single people combined, about seven in eight adults age 51 to 61 at baseline and about three-quarters of adults age 70 and older experience a negative individual or spousal shock over the observation period.

 

Resulting Changes in Household Wealth

 

Those who develop health-related work limitations during the period report baseline median wealth of $93,929 (in 2002 dollars), compared with $131,816 for those who never report these limitations. Real median wealth grows over the period by 17.1 percent for those who develop health conditions that limit work and by 45.7 percent for those who do not. Married adults with health-related work limitations at baseline experience even less favorable outcomes: They start the period with median wealth of only $67,092, which then grows by only 16.5 percent in real terms by the end of the period.

 

Results from median regressions of the level of household wealth in 2002 or the last interview reveal that job layoffs, divorce, and the onset of health-related work limitations sharply reduce household wealth for adults age 51 to 61.

 

What Does It All Mean?

 

If I think about my husband and I and my extended family, I think many if not most of us would say that we have done an adequate job of preparing for our later years. But looking at these numbers, I think you have to reassess. Given these probabilities, is what we, or our family members, have socked away really enough? Have we taken adequate precautions in the case of long term health issues?

 

For me, the moral of this story is you really have to plan AS IF one or more of these events will occur, not IN CASE they do. Further, that planning isn't just about money but also involves legal and emotional issues.

 

As always, I would like to know your thoughts. Do these numbers surprise you? If they do, are there changes you need to make now to account for the likelihood of a financial shock? What are they? Please post your thoughts and comments below.

 

SOURCE:

 

1. Richard W. Johnson, Gordon B.T. Mermin, and Cori E. Uccello. "When the Nest Egg Cracks: Financial Consequences of Health Problems, Marital Status Changes, and Job Layoffs at Older Ages" Working Paper Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Number 18; Released December, 2005.
http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/papers/wp_2005-18.html

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

 

December 12, 2005

Equity Ownership Facts

The number of households owning equities has increased by 7.1 million since 1999, in spite of a confidence jarring bear market.

 

57 million households own stock, either directly or indirectly through mutual funds.

 

Among equity-owning households, 90% own mutual funds and about half own individual stocks.

 

Between 1999 and 2005, the number of households owning equities through employer-sponsored retirement plans grew by 5.2 million. Over the same period, the number of households owning equities outside of ESRPs grew by 2.4 million households.

 

Of the households owning stocks, 75% own stocks or mutual funds outside their retirement plan.

 

By my reckoning, that means that 57 million households are taking too much risk.

 

SOURCE:

 

1. "Half Of U.S. Households Own Equities, Study Finds." Financial Advisor. December 2005. p. 26.

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

October 26, 2005

2005 Retirement Confidence Survey

How many Americans save? How much have they saved? What are their savings goals? EBRI (Employee Benefit Research Institute) has the answers in the 15th Retirement Confidence Survey. Here is what they found:

Americans' top three savings goals are retirement (69%), children's or grandchildren's education (20%) and a home purchase or renovation (11%). Only 62% of workers say they are currently saving for retirement. 69% say they or their spouse have saved at one time or another.

More than half of all workers report having saved less than $25,000 for retirement. Among workers 55+, only 19% report saving more than $250K! So, just to state the obvious - among workers 55 and over, 80% have saved less than $200K. 39% of them have saved less than $25K! Wow! Can you say impending crisis?!?

Only one-third of all workers think they need to accumulate at least $500,000 by the time they retire to live comfortably in retirement. Two in 10 think they will need between $250,000 and $499,999, and one-third think they need to save less than $250,000 for a comfortable retirement.

Even using the ridiculously conservative rule of thumb of 10X your pre-retirement income, someone with a household income of $50K a year would need more than $500K in retirement savings! Using the generally accepted maximum sustainable rate of withdrawal of 4%, a household with $1 million in savings could only withdraw $40,000 a year! Can you say massive education initiative needed?!?

SOURCES:

1. Employee Benefits Research Institute and Matthew Greenwald & Associates, Inc. "2005 Retirement Confidence Survey Fact Sheet" October, 2005.
http://www.ebri.org/pdf/surveys/rcs/2005/RCS05.FS.No2.SavInAm.Final.24Mar.pdf

The full 2005 Retirement Confidence Survey appeared in the April 2005 EBRI Issue Brief and is available at www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/0405ib.pdf.

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

October 24, 2005

Baby Boomer Numbers

The number of baby boomers in the United States is estimated at 76.9 million.

 

26.8% of the nation's population is made up of boomers.

 

51% of boomers are women. 16.9% are minorities.

 

32 million boomers are already 50 or older.

 

25 years from now, when boomers will be between the ages of 66 and 84, they will still be 20% of the population.

 

The divorce rate for boomers is 14.2% compared to 6.7% for the pre-boomer generation.

 

12.6% of boomers never married compared to 3.9% of the previous generation.

 

88.8% of boomers have a high school diploma

 

28.5% of boomers have a bachelor's degree or higher.

 

SOURCE:

Kelly Greene, "Boomers By The Numbers." Wall Street Journal 26 September 2005; R1

http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB112723609287646296.html (Subscription Required)

 

 

Beginning January 1, 2006, throughout North America, a baby boomer will turn 60 every eight seconds; that's 11,000 every day and four and a half million every year. On that date, not a single boomer is left under the age of forty!

 

SOURCE:

 

Dychtwald, Ken and Daniel J. Kadlec. The Power Years. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. p.2

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

August 22, 2005

Retirement Factoids

Almost a third of workers have not saved for retirement at all, about 40 percent are not saving currently and 45 percent have less than $25,000 in total savings and investments excluding their home. (Employee Benefits Research Institute's annual Retirement Confidence Survey, http://www.ebri.org)

 

Only about 40 percent of workers have calculated what retirement income they'll need. (Employee Benefits Research Institute's annual Retirement Confidence Survey, http://www.ebri.org)

 

More than half of workers expect to need 50 percent to 85 percent of their preretirement income to live on in retirement, while just 8 percent of workers expect to need "about the same" income in retirement. But 39 percent of the current retirees surveyed said their retirement-income needs are about the same as their preretirement earnings, suggesting many of today's workers could be in for a shock. (Employee Benefits Research Institute's annual Retirement Confidence Survey, http://www.ebri.org)

 

Only 19 percent of workers surveyed know the correct age at which they'll be eligible for full Social Security benefits. (Employee Benefits Research Institute's annual Retirement Confidence Survey, http://www.ebri.org)

 

22 percent of current workers say they'll retire later than age 65 to beef up their retirement savings. Thirty-seven percent of retirees said they left the workforce earlier than planned because of health problems or company downsizing. (Employee Benefits Research Institute's annual Retirement Confidence Survey, http://www.ebri.org)

 

For the last 11 years, the median retirement age has been 62. (Alicia Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College)

 

This information was culled from an article by Andrea Coombes, "The pension mirage: Few save enough for retirement, so why the optimism?" Marketwatch. (http://tinyurl.com/cofrc) 05 April 2004 (Free subscription required)

 

This information was added to the Retirement Factoid page on 04 September 2005

 


 

"One-third of boomers are in serious trouble. And another one-half of boomers are in between serious trouble and no trouble." (Robert Friedland, director of Georgetown University's Center on an Aging Society)

 

American retirees will have at least a $45 billion gap in retirement income in 2030 -- they'll be that much short of what they will need to cover basic expenditures and any expenses associated with nursing homes or home health-care providers. (Employee Benefits Research Institute, http://www.ebri.org/pdfs/1103ib.pdf)

 

This information was culled from an article by Robert Powell, "From nest egg to nothing: Outlive your savings? The concern is real." Marketwatch. (http://tinyurl.com/dl7hx) 03 March 2004 (Free subscription required)

 

This information was added to the Retirement Factoid page on 04 September 2005

 


 

75% of Americans between 51 and 61 will experience some sort of shock that could affect their financial well-being - including a serious health issue, divorce, death of a spouse, or loss of a job.

 

More than 50% of adults age 70 and over experience serious health problems , including cognitive impairment. One in three women in this age group and one in four men will enter a nursing home while in their 70s.

 

There is a 44% chance a wife will become a widow in her 70's and a 18% chance a husband will become a widower.

 

Older Americans experiencing these sorts of events have a 14% chance of falling into poverty vs. 7% when these events are not present.

 

SOURCE:

 

Paper presented at the Retirement Research Consortium's seventh annual conference

http://www.bc.edu/centers/crr/seventh_annual.shtml

 

Found in Bob Powell's Retirement Weekly, August 19, 2005 (Subscription Required)

http://www3.marketwatch.com/Store/products/retirement_weekly.aspx?siteid=mktw&dist=LAtabstore

 


 

Retirement fund assets invested in mutual funds in 2004 were $3.1 trillion.

 

All tax-advantaged retirement savings in 2004 - $12.9 trillion

 

SOURCE:

 

Investment Company Institute's annual report on the US retirement market

http://ici.org/pdf/fm-v14n4.pdf

 

Found in Bob Powell's Retirement Weekly, August 19, 2005 (Subscription Required)

http://www3.marketwatch.com/Store/products/retirement_weekly.aspx?siteid=mktw&dist=LAtabstore

 


 

Nearly 7 in 10 workers say they plan to work for pay, either full or part-time, following retirement. Only 13% expect to completely stop working.

 

More than one third of Americans save nothing for retirement beyond Social Security.

 

Less than half of American workers think they are doing a good job saving for retirement.

 

SOURCE:

 

Heidrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University

http://www.heldrich.rutgers.edu/Resources/Publication/191/WT16.pdf

 

Found in Bob Powell's Retirement Weekly, August 19, 2005 (Subscription Required)

http://www3.marketwatch.com/Store/products/retirement_weekly.aspx?siteid=mktw&dist=LAtabstore

 

 

Kim Snider, Kim Snider Financial Communications, Chronim Investments and/or Snider Advisors make no representation that the information and opinions expressed are accurate, complete or current. The opinions expressed should not be construed as financial, legal, tax, or other advice and are provided for informational purposes only. Call 866-952-0100 to request the Snider Investment Method™ Owner's Manual, which includes a description of the Snider Investment Method, investment objectives, risks, suitability and other information. Please read and consider carefully before investing. All investments are subject to risk including possible loss of principal.

Focus of This Blog


  • Kim Snider is an author, speaker and host of Financial Success Coaching, Saturdays at noon, on KRLD Newsradio 1080, Dallas - Fort Worth. This blog is primarily devoted to empowering individual investors with information to help them be good stewards of their money. Above all, it is about achieving true financial success. Kim's book, How To Be the Family CFO: Four Simple Steps to Put Your Financial House in Order will be in bookstores in October.

    Please note: Due to the high volume of Spam in our comments, the comments function has been disabled.
View Kim Snider's profile on LinkedIn

Subscribe via RSS

The Snider Insider